Click here for the complete strip archive.
March 26, 2015
March 20, 2015
Ken and Robin Talk About Stuff: Underground Subterranean Fort
In the latest episode of our well-excavated podcast, Ken and I talk overly real CGI, us as scared kids, the Toronto mystery tunnel and Charlemagne vs. Irminsul.
March 13, 2015
Ken and Robin Talk About Stuff: Helping People Steal Concrete
In the latest episode of their revelatory podcast, Ken and Robin talk F20 entheogens, Rahm’s run-off, status quo first acts, and Goetia.
March 06, 2015
Ken and Robin Talk About Stuff: Regional Resentments of Canadian Mollusks
In the latest episode of our ENnie-winning podcast, Ken and I talk headline ripping, Igor Gouzenko, heroic surveyors and George Hunt Williamson.
February 27, 2015
Ken and Robin Talk About Stuff: How to Alert the Occult Police
In the latest episode of their ENnie-winning podcast, Ken and Robin talk GM/player scenario collaboration, crime & upward mobility, hallucinations, and Ken’s Frisco book raid.
February 26, 2015
February 24, 2015
A Note to Middle and High School Teachers
This is a request for understanding and courtesy addressed to pre-secondary and secondary teachers.
Don’t assign projects requiring your students to contact creative professionals to ask for a chunk of their time. You don’t mean it to be, but this is presumptuous, and puts the kids in an awkward position. For creators, time is the precious resource we must all fight to preserve. I get more requests to give my time to academic projects than I can fulfill. I do take part in a few of them but most have to go by the wayside because I barely have the time to complete my professional, paying work. The same holds true, I am sure, for experts or notables in any number of other fields. Even taking the time to say no without seeming to slap the inquiring student down can be taxing. When contacted by an adult academic or teacher at least my quick, polite refusal or failure to respond will be taken for what it’s worth.
In the case of younger students I’m surprised that school policies don’t prevent this on safety grounds. Having minors send their contact info to adults they don’t know is maybe not the greatest idea.
If you are a young student who has made an approach like this as part of an assignment, I don’t want you to feel bad about it. It’s the teacher who should know this, not you.
This happens often enough that I’m saving my latest reply to use as boilerplate. Fellow creators, feel free to protect your own time by clipping and saving for your own use.
One of the big facts about life as a professional creator is that you have to be very protective of your time, concentrating on paying work. I'm sorry to say that your teacher, I'm sure with the very best intentions, has put you in a bit of an unfair position by asking you to impose on people who work in a field that interests you. I'm sure I'm not the only creator who feels bad about having to turn these requests down, but has to nonetheless.
I'd be grateful if you could please forward this reply to your teacher.
February 20, 2015
Ken and Robin Talk About Stuff: The Heavy Hand of the Fourth Wall
In the latest episode of our ENnie-winning podcast, Ken and I talk historical script immunity, eggshell boats, gotcha traps and 2014's best movies.
February 19, 2015
February 13, 2015
Ken and Robin Talk About Stuff: Blah Blah Zombies Blah Blah
In the latest episode of our ENnie-winning podcast, Ken and I talk campaign endings, Wyatt Earp’s ghost, mystery plotting and potato chip time travel.
February 12, 2015
February 05, 2015
January 29, 2015
January 22, 2015
January 16, 2015
Ken and Robin Talk About Stuff: Freemium Democratic Regime
In the latest episode of our ENnie-winning podcast, Ken and I talk School of Night, whiskey war, scene transitions, and the Illuminati hotel room.
January 08, 2015
The Birds: Charlie Hebdo (Updated with Rebuttal and Commentary)
The above comic strip depicts a character saying a dumb and wrongheaded thing in response to the Charlie Hebdo massacre. It was conceived as a critique of the character's stance. The Birds features a cast of twisted characters who regularly say dumb and wrongheaded things. This strip caused unnecessary hurt among French gamers, many of whom read it as me expressing the view I set out to criticize. Out of respect for their reaction I asked Yohann Delalande to expand comments made on Facebook into the following rebuttal. I am grateful to him for writing it.
Appended afterwards for ease of reference are my thoughts, written after I realized that the first panel was being read as an expression of my views, again adapted from a previous Facebook/G+ response.
Dear Robin,
When I saw this strip 2 days ago, a part of me was shocked, even though I could understand what you tried to convey. I also remembered that the perspective people from another continent have is tremendously different from those with an inside view, especially when you’re right in the middle of a real massacre. This is why I decided to wait a little before writing this post, just to make sure I was a bit more clear-headed.
As a The Birds reader, I know what the characters stand for, and that the comments they utter might not necessarily echo the opinions of their author. Aren’t these characters a cynical mirror of our society after all? They’re dysfunctional, constantly at each other’s throat and seem to revel in adopting all the evils of our culture as a way to validate their existence. The Birds can thus be said to belong to the caricature genre, because, honestly, I can’t picture a Robin D. Laws pulling a gun out at anybody for any verbal threats he might receive or perceive, unlike his characters.
However, very few French RPGers have ever read The Birds and this strip that has been published just at the beginning of a series of tragic events which have seen their conclusion only yesterday –or so I really hope –really hurts. We haven’t started to lick our wounds yet. Grieving is at its beginning. People died and a symbol of freedom which is really dear to us, freedom of speech, was attacked in the most violent way.
Many of us grew up reading these cartoonists, laughing at their silly style and messages. They were, and are still part of our culture. These cartoonists made us all laugh, they shocked us, they would knock down what could be called the French establishment with their caricatures, if such a thing has ever existed here. But what is also clear is that at every new issue of Charlie Hebdo, the journalists, chroniclers and cartoonists voiced their own opinion in what’s going wrong in our country, but also in the world, opinions that would find an echo among many people, which would shake the certitudes held by many others and which would give them food for thoughts, but which would also cause a lot of outcries from fundamentalists and targeted politicians.
Then it happened. Since last Wednesday, 17 people have died, slaughtered by terrorists who are trying to force their laws on ours. The French people has been quick to react and the reaction of support from the whole world to this tragedy that hit us has really warmed our heart with blog posts, speeches and cartoons.
Conversely, many people arose on the internet, pointing fingers at this weekly newspaper and at what they denounced as racism and sexism. The debate shifted from standing up against terror and the attempt to crush down our freedom of speech to a debate about whether Charlie Hebdo was a “creepy racist”, misogynistic and anti LGBT newspaper.
Many have been justifying their claims by saying that if complaints were filed against them, only to be dismissed soon after by the French justice, it obviously means they’re guilty. Many arguments backing that view can be found on the social media. But I’m not writing this post to try and prove them wrong. I’m just trying to explain why your strip has hurt us.
As a side note, we've got a 40-year old law here - the Pleven law - which fines and/or sentences to jail any racist and hate acts, be they voiced or enacted. And if some French politicians have already been condemned thanks to this law, then I’ll leave the readers free to make their own judgment.
When I saw this strip 2 days ago, a part of me was shocked, even though I could understand what you tried to convey. I also remembered that the perspective people from another continent have is tremendously different from those with an inside view, especially when you’re right in the middle of a real massacre. This is why I decided to wait a little before writing this post, just to make sure I was a bit more clear-headed.
As a The Birds reader, I know what the characters stand for, and that the comments they utter might not necessarily echo the opinions of their author. Aren’t these characters a cynical mirror of our society after all? They’re dysfunctional, constantly at each other’s throat and seem to revel in adopting all the evils of our culture as a way to validate their existence. The Birds can thus be said to belong to the caricature genre, because, honestly, I can’t picture a Robin D. Laws pulling a gun out at anybody for any verbal threats he might receive or perceive, unlike his characters.
However, very few French RPGers have ever read The Birds and this strip that has been published just at the beginning of a series of tragic events which have seen their conclusion only yesterday –or so I really hope –really hurts. We haven’t started to lick our wounds yet. Grieving is at its beginning. People died and a symbol of freedom which is really dear to us, freedom of speech, was attacked in the most violent way.
Many of us grew up reading these cartoonists, laughing at their silly style and messages. They were, and are still part of our culture. These cartoonists made us all laugh, they shocked us, they would knock down what could be called the French establishment with their caricatures, if such a thing has ever existed here. But what is also clear is that at every new issue of Charlie Hebdo, the journalists, chroniclers and cartoonists voiced their own opinion in what’s going wrong in our country, but also in the world, opinions that would find an echo among many people, which would shake the certitudes held by many others and which would give them food for thoughts, but which would also cause a lot of outcries from fundamentalists and targeted politicians.
Then it happened. Since last Wednesday, 17 people have died, slaughtered by terrorists who are trying to force their laws on ours. The French people has been quick to react and the reaction of support from the whole world to this tragedy that hit us has really warmed our heart with blog posts, speeches and cartoons.
Conversely, many people arose on the internet, pointing fingers at this weekly newspaper and at what they denounced as racism and sexism. The debate shifted from standing up against terror and the attempt to crush down our freedom of speech to a debate about whether Charlie Hebdo was a “creepy racist”, misogynistic and anti LGBT newspaper.
Many have been justifying their claims by saying that if complaints were filed against them, only to be dismissed soon after by the French justice, it obviously means they’re guilty. Many arguments backing that view can be found on the social media. But I’m not writing this post to try and prove them wrong. I’m just trying to explain why your strip has hurt us.
As a side note, we've got a 40-year old law here - the Pleven law - which fines and/or sentences to jail any racist and hate acts, be they voiced or enacted. And if some French politicians have already been condemned thanks to this law, then I’ll leave the readers free to make their own judgment.
Today, our whole
country is standing up against terrorism, against censorship, against
attacks on our freedom of speech and freedom of press, and even
though anybody is entitled to have their own opinion regarding
Charlie Hebdo, be it documented or not, grieving shouldn’t be
confused with worshipping, just like creepy racism shouldn’t be
equated with bawdy irreverence, which many French excel at
actually.
To come back to The Birds now, what I’m trying to tell you, Robin, is that you should know that all the French RPGers who have seen your recent strip strongly feel that you’ve endorsed the side of those who ‘re denouncing Charlie Hebdo as racist, that your characters mirror your own opinions, when what you actually meant was that their debate should wait.
But as I said at the beginning of this message, a part of me was shocked by your strip when I saw it too. This massacre is too recent, it has shaken us so violently, and nobody could see where your support was. We didn’t feel that you were empathizing with the events we’ve been living these last few days. We didn’t understand you, but most importantly, we thought that you didn’t understand us.
To come back to The Birds now, what I’m trying to tell you, Robin, is that you should know that all the French RPGers who have seen your recent strip strongly feel that you’ve endorsed the side of those who ‘re denouncing Charlie Hebdo as racist, that your characters mirror your own opinions, when what you actually meant was that their debate should wait.
But as I said at the beginning of this message, a part of me was shocked by your strip when I saw it too. This massacre is too recent, it has shaken us so violently, and nobody could see where your support was. We didn’t feel that you were empathizing with the events we’ve been living these last few days. We didn’t understand you, but most importantly, we thought that you didn’t understand us.
Your comic strip has hurt us, Robin, whether we can put some context behind it or not, and even though it was unintentional. Its publication was untimely, its formulation too ambiguous and it has been felt like a slap on our face coming from a game designer many of us admire and look up to.
Yohann Delalande,
January 10, 2014
Back to Robin:
If you create something and people hate it, you should be ready to take your lumps.
I was slow to realize that French readers were reacting to the strip as if Shirley in the first panel is speaking for me. It has taken me a while to fully twig to this because I’m on the road and unable to track conversations in real time. But even more because to me the premise of this strip, as far as I’m concerned, is that Shirley is saying very much the wrong thing.
I felt compelled to write this strip watching the English language conversation around a number of racially charged images from Charlie Hebdo. Although from a North American perspective certain of them are very hard to look at, I felt, and feel, that the time to have a debate over their propriety is not now, after the mass murder of cartoonists, staffers and police. Maybe in a year or two, maybe never, but not when the focus should be on the crucial importance of free speech when it is under deadly threat.
Yohann helped to further clarify matters by pointing out that a flood of readers has come to the strip for the first time. If you read the Birds, you know that all of the characters are crazy or wrongheaded and that none of them are soapbox characters simply spouting the author’s views. If you’re seeing it for the first time, though, you might not take what they’re saying with the necessary grain of salt. I was expecting the usual tiny trickle of clicks a Birds post gets, and failed to envision who would be confronted by it if it went viral.
I see this installment of the Birds strip as being about how hard people find it to support the freedom of speech they dislike. Shirley starts out wanting to focus on concerns that are, in the wake of these events, beside the point. If there's a character who agrees with me in this strip, it's Steve. But then he blows it too by expressing frustration at having to defend something he dislikes. Many of us can relate to that conflicted feeling, even as I would hope we rise above it and do the right thing.
These characters, and that common human frailty the strip portrays, are the butt of the joke, Not the victims of the massacre.
Since I was taking a shot at the position I assigned to Shirley I failed to anticipate that so many would take the strip as my endorsement of it.
As a general rule you have failed as an artist if you have to explain your intent. We are responsible for the impact of what we do and not just what we meant to do.
For some the strip succeeded. They saw the context; the execution worked for them, and they read the strip with its intended meaning.
For those who read it not as a comment on how the vital importance of speech rights demands our respect for the fallen, but as a shot at them, I failed you by context or execution or both, causing you distress at a traumatic time. This distresses me in turn.
So what to do? It seems paradoxical to respond to pushback on a strip about free speech and the limits of cartooning by taking it down. It should stay up, if nothing else, so people who wish to do so can continue to lambast me for it. Hence this decision, to ask Yohann to rebut the cartoon, as he has so splendidly done here.January 06, 2015
My Chupacabracon Schedule
This weekend I’m pleased to appear at Chupacabracon at the Norris Conference Center in historic Austin Texas. Organizers have rounded up a veritable constellation of tabletop luminaries, including my boon compadre Kenneth Hite, Feng Shui 2 developer Cam Banks, and Hillfolk contributors Jason Morningstar, Steven S. Long, John Wick and Sean Patrick Fannon.
Find me paneling, signing, podcasting and hobnobbing as follows:
Friday – Effective Networking in the Game Industry 4:30pm-6pm
Friday – Opening Ceremonies 6pm-7pm
Friday – VIP Meet and Greet 7pm-8:30pm
Saturday – Elements of RPG Game Design 9am-10:30am
Saturday – Building Memorable RPG Villains 11am-12:30pm
Saturday – Signing at Dragon’s Lair Books & Comics 1pm-2pm
Saturday – Ken and Robin Talk About Stuff LIVE 7pm-8:30pm
Sunday – VIP Brunch and Bitch 10am-11:30am
Hope to see you there, Austinites! Although your weather forecast is nowhere near as balmy as when I first started looking, it will still be an improvement on what we have here in Toronto.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)