The announcement for the upcoming new version of Dungeons & Dragons positions it as an Ecumenical Council for tabletop roleplaying's flagship title. Reuniting the disparate partisans of the dread Edition Wars under a single new banner is a tough brief. The Mearls-Cook-Cordell-Schwalb team comprises a formidable brain trust--one well-wired into the sometimes paradoxical demands of the gamer tribe. So I'm very curious to see what they draw from each past version as they assemble this Uber-edition. Given my past freelancing for the line, the possibility exists that I might get to see what they're up to—and thus be unable to talk about it. So, before that happens, here's my list, untainted by actual information, of what I'd hope to see swept into the new iteration.
Of course the vastness of the challenge is that everybody will have a different list.
4E
Concise, manageable, easy-to-design creature stat blocks
On-line tools add ease of play
Alignment simplified and detached from mechanics
3E
Open license as focus of community excitement
2nd Edition
Emphasis on setting (though this is a double-edged sword, as splitting the line into multiple settings started the great D&D diaspora)
Advanced Dungeons & Dragons
baseline tropes of the D&D feel (whatever that is, leaving out the dysfunctional ones)
prose style brimming with idiosyncratic personality
serves as introduction to the fantasy canon
Blue Box Introductory Set
fast combat
feeling of being a kid again
Comments that ignore the above conceit to simply stake out a prior position in the Edition Wars are permissible, but will be silently judged.
To my wish list I would add "From 3.x, the option to customize the class abilities and capabilities of my character. "
ReplyDeletePersonal conceits:
ReplyDelete4e - powers approach to monsters, transparency in monster design, at-the-table considerations
3e - open license, building block character design (though lower default complexity)
B/X/C/M - quick combat, fast character creation, expansions provide obvious learning path and "ignorable" options for expanding a basic game, slower advancement of numerical stats in characters, an optional set of "end game" scenarios (name level strongholds/guilds/research, immortality, domains), the option to run quick, dramatic combats without minis or tactical concerns, baseline tropes of d&d
2e - settings, if it makes financial sense